ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effects of the Cement Kiln Dust on the Ultrasonic Wave Velocity in the cement mortar
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Karbala, Iraq
 
 
Submission date: 2022-03-11
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-12-12
 
 
Publication date: 2022-12-16
 
 
Sensors and Machine Learning Applications 2022;1(2)
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The mixture of the traditional cement mortar is mainly made from three components; ordinary Portland cement (OPC), sand and water. However, the OPC has many proven adverse effects on the environment and economy, such as harmful emissions and depletion of natural sources. Therefore, some studies try to minimise the use of OPC in cement mortar by providing and testing some alternatives, such as Cement Kiln Dust (CKD). The available studies confirm the applicability of CKD as a promising alternative to OPC in cement mortar. This study will explore the effects of different percentages of CKD (10-30% of OPC amount) on the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) in the cement mortar's properties. This study showed that adding CKD as a partial replacement for OPC decreases the UPV compared to the reference sample.
 
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Al-faluji, D., Al-rubaye, M. M., Nasr, M. S., Shubbar, A. A., Al-khafaji, Z. S., Alkhayyat, A. & Abdulraheem, M. S. Impact of Substitute Portland Cement with CKD on the Mechanical and Durability Characteristics of Cement Mortar. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021. IOP Publishing, 012035.
 
2.
Chen, W., Hong, J. & Xu, C. 2015. Pollutants generated by cement production in China, their impacts, and the potential for environmental improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 61-69.
 
3.
Emetere, M. & Dania, E. Short review on air pollution from cement factories. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019. IOP Publishing, 012033.
 
4.
Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L. & Lin, E. 2012. Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 6220-6238.
 
5.
Madsen, H., Thyregod, P., Popentiu, F. & Albeanu, G. Computer Aided Modeling and Pollution Control in Cement Plants. Fourth Annual Meeting of ENBIS–20–22, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2004.
 
6.
Pariyar, S. K., Das, T. & Ferdous, T. 2013. Environment and health impact for brick kilns in Kathmandu valley. Int J Sci Technol Res, 2, 184-187.
 
7.
Alharthi, Y. M., Elamary, A. S. & Abo-El-Wafa, W. 2021. Performance of plain concrete and cement blocks with cement partially replaced by cement kiln dust. Materials, 14,5647.
 
8.
Duan, P., Shui, Z., Chen, W. & Shen, C. 2013. Enhancing microstructure and durability of concrete from ground granulated blast furnace slag and metakaolin as cement replacement materials. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2, 52-59.
 
9.
Kabay, N., Tufekci, M. M., Kizilkanat, A. B. & Oktay, D. 2015. Properties of concrete with pumice powder and fly ash as cement replacement materials. Construction and Building Materials, 85, 1-8.
 
10.
Shoaei, P., Zolfaghary, S., Jafari, N., Dehestani, M.& Hejazi, M. 2017. Investigation of adding cement kiln dust (CKD) in ordinary and lightweight concrete. Advances in concrete construction, 5, 101.
 
11.
Torkaman, J., Ashori, A. & Momtazi, A. S. 2014. Using wood fiber waste, rice husk ash, and limestone powder waste as cement replacement materials for lightweight concrete blocks. Construction and building materials, 50, 432-436.
 
eISSN:2753-4154
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top