ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Modelling the impact of inter-electrode spacing on nitrate removal using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Galgotias College of Engineering, Greater Noida 201310, India
2
Department of Biology, College of Education for pure Sciences, Tikrit University, Iraq
Submission date: 2023-09-15
Acceptance date: 2023-09-29
Publication date: 2023-09-30
Sensors and Machine Learning Applications 2023;2(3)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Nitrate contamination in water poses a significant concern for environmental engineers, as it has substantial and direct impacts on water quality, the economy, and public health. Consequently, managing nitrate levels in water sources ranks among the top priorities for water authorities. Currently, various treatment methods, including biological treatments and adsorption, are employed to eliminate nitrate from water or wastewater. A substantial body of literature exists focused on the application of electrocoagulation (EC) for nitrate removal from solutions. This method is favoured for its environmentally friendly attributes and ability to swiftly and cost-effectively remove pollutants. In this study, the EC method was employed to eliminate nitrate from water under varying inter-electrode spacing (I-ES) conditions ranging from 4 to 10 mm and different treatment durations (TD) spanning 5 to 55 minutes. The effects of I-ES and TD on nitrate removal were optimised using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The study's results demonstrated that the most effective nitrate removal, reaching 91.3%, occurred at an I-ES of 4 mm and a TD of 50 minutes. The agreement between the experimentally observed and predicted removal rates was notably high, with an R2 value of 0.973.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Ano, J.; Briton, BGH; Kouassi, K.E.; Adouby, K. Nitrate removal by electrocoagulation process using experimental design methodology: A techno-economic optimisation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2020, 8, 104292.
2.
Hashim, K.S.; Shaw, A.; Al Khaddar, R.; Pedrola, M.O.; Phipps, D. Energy efficient electrocoagulation using a new flow column reactor to remove nitrate from drinking water - Experimental, statistical, and economic approach. Journal of Environmental Management 2017, 196, 224-233, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.017.
3.
Nazlabadi, E.; Moghaddam, M.R.A.; Karamati-Niaragh, E. Simultaneous removal of nitrate and nitrite using electrocoagulation/floatation (ECF): a new multi-response optimisation approach. Journal of environmental management 2019, 250, 109489.
4.
Osamah, A.-H.; Hashim, K.; Loffill, E.; Marolt Čebašek, T.; Nakouti, I.; Faisal, A.A.; AlAnsari, N. A Comprehensive Review for Groundwater Contamination and Remediation: Occurrence, Migration and Adsorption Modelling. Molecules 2021, 26, 5913, 5911-5928, doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecu....
5.
Acharya, S.; Sharma, S.; Chauhan, G.; Shree, D. Statistical optimisation of electrocoagulation process for removal of nitrates using response surface methodology. Indian chemical engineer 2018, 60, 269-284.
6.
Majlesi, M.; Mohseny, S.M.; Sardar, M.; Golmohammadi, S.; Sheikhmohammadi, A. Improvement of aqueous nitrate removal by using continuous electrocoagulation/electroflotation unit with vertical monopolar electrodes. Sustainable Environment Research 2016, 26, 287-290.
8.
Della Rocca, C.; Belgiorno, V.; Meriç, S. Overview of in-situ applicable nitrate removal processes. Desalination 2007, 204, 46 62.
9.
Organization, W.H.; WHO.; Staff, W.H.O. Guidelines for drinking-water quality; World Health Organization: 2004; Volume 1.
10.
Abdulhadi, B.; Kot, P.; Hashim, K.; Shaw, A.; Muradov, M.; Al-Khaddar, R. Continuous-flow electrocoagulation (EC) process for iron removal from water: Experimental, statistical and economic study. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 760, 1-16, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143417.
11.
Al-Qodah, Z.; Al-Shannag, M. Heavy metal ions removal from wastewater using electrocoagulation processes: a comprehensive review. Separation Science and Technology 2017, 52, 2649-2676.
12.
Castaneda, L.F.; Rodriguez, J.F.; Nava, J.L. Electrocoagulation as an affordable technology for decontamination of drinking water containing fluoride: A critical review. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021, 413, 127529.
13.
Kumari, S.; Kumar, R.N. River water treatment using electrocoagulation for removal of acetaminophen and natural organic matter. Chemosphere 2021, 273, 128571.
14.
Bhagawan, D.; Poodari, S.; Chaitanya, N.; Ravi, S.; Rani, Y.M.; Himabindu, V.; Vidyavathi, S. Industrial solid waste landfill leachate treatment using electrocoagulation and biological methods. Desalin Water Treat 2017, 68, 137-142.
15.
Attour, A.; Touati, M.; Tlili, M.; Amor, M.B.; Lapicque, F.; Leclerc, J.-P. Influence of operating parameters on phosphate removal from water by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes. Separation and Purification Technology 2014, 123, 124-129.
16.
Nanseu-Njiki, C.P.; Tchamango, S.R.; Ngom, P.C.; Darchen, A.; Ngameni, E. Mercury (II) removal from water by electrocoagulation using aluminium and iron electrodes. Journal of hazardous materials 2009, 168, 1430-1436.